Why The Prime Directive is Evil

I’ve been a fan of Star Trek since the original series was in its first run. I loved it. When The Next Generation came along years later (and these can be fighting words), I thought it was even better in some ways.

But there were a few things about TNG that rubbed me the wrong way, and the biggest of those was the Prime Directive. (It played a small role in the original series, but a large one in TNG.) I couldn’t define why it bothered me back in 1990, but there was something wrong about it it… something anti-human about it. Now, however, I understand, and perhaps you’d like to as well.

Let Me Count The Ways

Yes, that’s a Shakespeare/Picard riff.

Here are five ways the Prime Directive was inherently flawed:

#1: It was stupidizing.

The first problem with the Prime Directive was that it made the captains stupid. Rather than doing what they knew had to be done, they had to contend with a wrench thrown into their formerly strong minds. It was, to have fun with words, stupidizing to those captains. It made them delay rational choices. In the end they ignored the Prime Directive anyway – reason and decency demanded it – or else they found some clever way around it.

#2: It was a cheap plot device.

Writers for TV are urged to create conflict, and either exterior conflicts (Kilngons and Romulans) or crises of conscience will do. And so the Prime Directive became a fast, cheap way to give the captain a moral conflict. In the end, the captain would, again, either ignore the Prime Directive or find some slick way around it, because the audience would have been repulsed if he or she didn’t. That’s not good writing.

In some episodes of the later series you can see the writers struggling for a plot that will make the Prime Directive look good. Those are among the least satisfying episodes of the franchise.

#3: It was an insult to reason and to the reasonable mind.

When encountering a difficult situation, a capable person considers the facts available and tries to imagine a win-win resolution. And Star Fleet officers were supposed to be great at this: That the primary attribute of a great captain, after all, and it was generally the Federation’s flagship we were observing.

What we saw were these powerful minds and wills brought low by the basest of mental choices: a binary, obey-or-transgress choice. And so those brilliantly creative minds were turned into mundane, weak minds. Until the end, of course, when they sort of redeemed themselves.

#4: It placed the scribblings of rulers above reality.

A Starfleet captain, finding himself in a previously unimaginable situation, is a fool to follow rules drafted long ago and trillions of miles away. As Sun Tzu once wrote: “There is no greater evil than the orders of the king from his court.”

I will admit, however, that these scenarios did illustrate the insane arrogance of the edict-writers, thinking that their puny imaginations (riffing on Q now) were able to grasp the fabric of an unknown universe and to divine forever-perfect words.

Lunacy ought not to be enthroned, but that’s what the Prime Directive did.

#5: It made humans into derivative beings.

This is the big one, and the one that I’m calling evil.

The Prime Directive insisted that people are created by cultures… that they owe their lives, their characters, their souls to some culture, no matter how backward and bizarre. It didn’t allow people to improve, unless the culture around them improved first.

But what is a culture? It’s nothing but a set of ideas that people pass from generation to generation. So, allow me to make one point very plainly, because the sloganized BS of our time would have us unable to conceive it:

Without people, there can be no culture, but without culture, people continue. And so people are the primary entities. Cultures are merely derived, abstract entities.

Cultures do not create us, we create them. In no way are they sacrosanct, nor should they be.

The Prime Directive and the Marxist, Postmodern foolishness behind it would reverse this, turning us into subordinate, derived beings. And that again is lunacy.

The Prime Directive is evil because it devolves humanity, turning us into slaves and ultimately into lesser creatures. Political addicts love it because it places them as gods, but for them to truly get their way, we’d have to devolve into sheep. (Which may be what they’re after.)

Last Words

I suspect that this whole mess began with poorly conceived anti-war rhetoric, back in the Vietnam era. Still, whose idea was it to turn it into something huge as TNG kicked off?

Whoever it was should have been show the door.

**

Paul Rosenberg

freemansperspective.com

One thought on “Why The Prime Directive is Evil”

  1. I don’t necessarily dislike the Star Trek spinoffs. But spinoffs is what they are.

    The Jeffersons and Maud are not All in the Family, even though they occur in the same fictional universe.

    Frasier is not Cheers.

    The Next Generation, Deep Space Nine, et al. are not Star Trek, even though they occur in the same fictional universe, and even though at least some of them are pretty darn good.

    I think you put your finger on one reason I didn’t like The Next Generation as much as I liked Star Trek. The … preachiness … was different because the Prime Directive was much more at the center of things.

Comments are closed.