The Weaponization of Medicine

Whether or not we can express it clearly, or even perceive it clearly, I think nearly every adult grasps that medicine is being used as a weapon. 

I am not a doctor, but I’ve been surrounded by medical professionals since my youth, beginning with my mom, who was not only an RN, but Head Nurse at two different hospitals. I’ve also been involved with science for a long time.

I’ll be brief, making just five primary points. But we’ve been losing science and we’ve been losing medicine; that is flatly unacceptable.

#1: Science is not consensus. Ten, one hundred, or a million people, all draped in lab coats and saying the same thing, does NOT make it so. In fact, it matters not at all. It’s nothing but theater, and it’s anti-science.

All science is, really, is a process of testing ideas; it is not an organization, it is not based upon authority (it’s inherently anti-authority), and it is very certainly not allied with power. All that matters in science are verifiable results.

#2: Medicine stands apart from, and above, politicsMedicine is the application of science to the furtherance of human health. Politics is the use of persuasion and power to rule masses of humans. These are fully separate disciplines. To place politics over medicine is to subjugate and degrade medicine: it’s a path backwards into darkness.

I’ll leave details on this point to working medical practitioners, who can provide them with far greater specificity than I can… provided they’re not too frightened to do so.

#3: Peer review no longer means much. Again I won’t go into great detail, but peer review has been captured by academic hierarchies and almost fully separated from science proper. It has become a tool of institutional power, wielded by academics who have sold out science for the favors of power and politics.

At one time, “peer review” referred to the honest replication of experiments. That time is past.

#4: Medicine and science have nothing to do with social pressure. Once “medicine” and “science” are mixed with social pressure, they are no longer science or medicine. At that point they are instruments of thuggery, and nothing more.

#5: If you don’t read multiple scientific papers, especially from rebels and cast-outs, you simply don’t know. You can pretend you know, of course, and you can be sure that agents of the status quo will provide you with passable reasons to repeat their slogans, but you won’t actually know.

What you see on TV is propaganda. What you see on Facebook, Twitter and YouTube is pre-censored. If you want to really know, you’ll have to find the scientific papers that address your question… and you’ll need papers that are rejected by televised authorities. If you don’t, all you’ll have are pre-censored conclusions, the underlying facts of which may or may not be reliable.

At this point, if you don’t include “conspiracy theory” research, you’re more or less stuck with Orwell’s Ministry of Truth. Sad but mostly true.

The Problem Is Emotional Weakness

The problem underlying all of this is not intellectual strength, it’s emotional strength. It’s not that people are stupid, it’s that they haven’t the strength to face unauthorized truth:

    • Having been trained in submission to authority, to then speak against an authority is terrifying. And so people find ways to ignore truth (which has no backing but itself) and to sanctify authority, which is backed by everything from shame to guns.
    • The fear of appearing stupid – of being publicly exposed as stupid – can be overwhelming. And with “important” people tearing up anyone not in lockstep with them, defiance seems too expensive.
    • Power being wrong calls too much into question. If the high and mighty can be publicly wrong, repeatedly and adamantly, what can’t be called into question? And if everything can be questioned, one must face the world alone.
    • Once people act upon fear, they can either turn against it and admit their error, or they can defend their errors at length. And if the people who thrive on those fears maintain a stream of frights and slogans… anyone on “the other side” becomes a heretic, to be hunted down and forced to submit.

None of these things have any connection to truth, only to power and intimidation. And that is anti-science, no matter how much it masquerades as science.

**

Paul Rosenberg

freemansperspective.com

26 thoughts on “The Weaponization of Medicine”

  1. I agree 100%. This is certainly applicable to the suppression of inexpensive, and effective cures for Covid-19, such as Ivermection, and Hydroxycloriquine. Cancer cures are also being suppressed. It’s all about money. I know that one must do their own research, as the media and politicians have zero credibility.

    1. I am from Malaysia. It is really tiring to face all of this,i believe all of us feeling the same. Every time I tried to speak up they will judge me as a anti vaccine. My government said vaccine was not compulsory but then they put so many restrictions and we cant even enter certain shop. All of those vaccine people act so arrogantly as if they cant transmit the virus. Such a bullshit.

  2. Thank you for this article! I am a healthcare professional of 47 yrs and when you can no longer trust CDC, FDA, so called “experts” and you are FORCED by your government and/or employer to submit to a vaccine that is not effective and has more risks than benefits…it’s time to draw a line in the sand and so NO!

    1. Can no longer trust? When were they trustworthy? When they experimented on , and killed many people, mostly dark skinned in other countries? If we had cared enough to stop them then, we would not be facing their power against us now. This is on us.

      1. I agree, this been going on for over 200 years here and all over the world much longer. The power grabbing of the wealthy to control the masses who are not of their elitist heritage not matter the cost in time, money, intimidation, lies, propaganda and lives of the Sheeple. However, their days are numbered and their nefarious Machiavellian agendas are programmed to self destruct by their own greed and evil rebellion against life.v

  3. Why stop at medicine? How about the weaponization of energy, government, corporations, and on and on and on.
    Great article!

  4. Excellent executive summary and a very smart analysis of what is currently happening on the world stage!
    Based on your objectivity, I’m sure there is an interesting back-story on how you avoided getting sucked down in the hundreds of various rabbit-holes during the past year and a half.
    It was enlightening to read an article that contains wisdom, knowledge and understanding!

  5. As one well versed in terms of Science, & the scientific method I, for one, wholeheartedly agree with this article, and the author.

    As a signatory & charter member of the 2014 Cambridge Working Group Call-to-Action on deadly American manufactured Gain-of-Function pandemic pathogens I, for one, can also assure the author that Sars-2-nCoV-19 is a deadly American manufactured Fourth Generation Biowarfare bioweapon purposely deployed against China’s Hunan Seafood Market post-Wuhan Military Games 2019 via an embedded IO withing the American contingent of athletes.

    http://www.cambridgeworkinggroup.org/
    Robert Gordon White Carleton University fm453@ncf.ca

    RW

    1. Dear Mr. White,
      I read the following from Cambridge Working Group Consensus Statement on the Creation of Potential Pandemic Pathogens (PPPs), “Such incidents have been accelerating and have been occurring on average over twice a week with regulated pathogens in academic and government labs across the country.” (6-years ago).
      I have always wondered what some of the worlds most renowned scientists were saying & thinking about issues at Ft. Detrick and other high level biolabs around the world.
      Dr. Steven Quay, a Seattle-based physician-scientist, former faculty member at the Stanford University School of Medicine, who looked at early COVID-19 samples uploaded by scientists at the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) shortly after China informed the World Health Organization about the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak., “We found genetic manipulation of the Nipah virus, which is more lethal than Ebola.” Nipah is a type of Henipah virus.” According to the report, this Nipah virus came from a lab in Canada. Two Chinese scientists from the lab were fired & Canada wouldn’t respond to questions because of national security.
      We as Americans and other people around the world want to know why highly intelligent scientists keep wanting to open “Pandora’s Box”?
      Now global politics are pointing the fingers at each other, yet any and all governments involved in GoF need to accept some responsibility in all this.
      Very depressing…
      Could be why God said one day he would have to destroy this world with fire (burn away pathogens, viruses, GoF, bio-weapons, etc.) and start anew…
      Thank you,
      Tom Bartelt

  6. “The problem underlying all of this is not intellectual strength, it’s emotional strength. It’s not that people are stupid, it’s that they haven’t the strength to face unauthorized truth.”

    Yes, but you’re only going halfway in your thinking. You are essentially blaming the victims here.

    Speaking against authority or appearing stupid isn’t terrifying due to some sort of cowardice or character weakness, but due to the simple fact that those that would speak against authority seldom get a chance to speak at all in a place where they may get a reasonable amount of audience, and when they do get a tiny time slot to speak, they are terrified of blowing their tiny chance to get listened to again by saying the wrong things.

    Power being wrong certainly calls too much into question. And what adds to the problem is that in uncertain times, the choice often is between following power when power is clearly wrong, and refusing to follow power and risking chaos, and neither of the choices is attractive.

    As for admitting vs defending errors, the problem is one of people lacking the option to be flexible in what they say, and that happens when they either have tiny time slots to say it, or when they are trying to say it to such a broad audience, that they know it’s impossible to cover all the possible ground that the audience may need to hear, which leads again to super-simplified messaging as the safest option, because no nuanced messaging will ever be nuanced enough.

    In short, it isn’t that people are weak. It’s that people are facing a task that is, if not impossible, pretty close to impossible.

    1. There is certainly some truth in what you’re saying, Doly, but three points come to mind for me:
      1. We can always start small. We NEED to speak the truth, for our own sake. Small, local, friends and family are fine places to start. In fact, they matter more than the public square in many cases.
      2. It may be that I think people are generally more able than you do.
      3. At some point we all need to feel the fear but do it anyway.
      Cheers!

  7. Just stick to the facts of phenomena. Don’t believe anything else if you are not sure of the science.

  8. The more concise expression of my own thoughts and feelings on the most critical matter of our time.

    A very big THANK YOU.

  9. There is a critical, pragmatic problem.

    One can find papers or experts, that are believable to the layperson, on either side of the (for example) COVID vaccine problem. I’m convinced by the last good one I read.

    I have no training or experience in the field. Often the “good ones” turn out to have some statistical problem, shady conflict of interest, or some other nullifying problem. I couldn’t tell by the “data” or the “science”.

    Try reading experts espousing the opposite opinion that you hold on any contentious scientific issue and see if you don’t conclude “I just don’t know”.

    Ultimately I’m left having to listen to my doctor, who taps into expert consensus. I’m annoyed because I’m naturally a contrarian. So while we don’t know that the expert consensus is right, and it often isn’t, I think it’s the best we have.

  10. I am a physician who works as in the ICU in a hospital in a small city in the southeastern US. I agree with much of what Paul is saying. “Organized” medicine is corrupt and controlled by those who would be our masters. Peer review is frequently a joke. I don’t know how the Wuhan virus originated, but it very well could have been developed as a weapon in the virology lab there. Unless you believe the Chinese will start telling the truth, we may never know.
    However it started, however, from a practical standpoint, just like James in A Lodging of Wayfaring Men, I have to believe what I am seeing with my own eyes. I have admitted many patients to ICU, put them on ventilators, and watched them die or go home with deficits from strokes or on dialysis or other severe disabilities. Many of them were taking Ivermectin. This time last year it was Plaquenil. We were giving people Plaquenil last year because we had nothing else to offer except supportive care while we waited for people to improve or die. It has been a horrible 18 months.
    The only thing I have seen that is making a difference in outcomes is vaccination. I have admitted many people who have been vaccinated, but have seen no deaths, although I know they occur. Before the variants, the numbers had plunged. Now the hospitals look like field hospitals in a war.
    I don’t care if you take Ivermectin or Plaquenil if it makes you more relaxed. But if you want to avoid a bad outcome, get vaccinated. No, the vaccine is not completely safe, nothing in life is. I have seen several people with adverse reactions to the mRNA vaccines, but only one life threatening case.
    Again, I am relying on the evidence of my own eyes. I am vaccinated, as is everyone in my family. I wear a mask in stores. My mask reduces the risk I will infect you, and yours reduces the risk you will infect me. There are other variants being watched (mu comes to mind) which are both highly contagious like Delta, and more vaccine resistant. I hope enough people either get vaccinated or survive the infection that we are over this soon. Historically, pandemics like this tend to last about 3 years.

Comments are closed.